The Fourier Transform ,we move on in our program of decomposing arbitrary functions into sinusoids. We have seen how a periodic function can be expressed as a Fourier series,
so now we seek a similar representation for nonperiodic functions. To begin with, let’s assume we are given a nonperiodic function , which is, say, continuously differentiable. Then if we pick an interval of the form
we can represent
by a Fourier series for in this interval:
(1)
with coefficients given by
(n=0,±1,±2,…) (2)
Actually the series in Eq. (1) defines a periodic function , which coincides with
on
;
[Notice that F(t) may be discontinuous even though F(t) is smooth.]
Thus we have a sinusoidal representation of over an interval of length L. If we now let
it seems reasonable to conjecture that this might evolve into a sinusoidal representation of
valid for all t. Let’s explore this possibility. sinuot → ∞, We are going to rewrite these equations in what will seen at first like a rather bizarre form, but it will aid in interpreting them as
. We define
to be
, and introduce the factor [(n+1)-n]= 1 into the series in Eq. (1). Then we have
(3)
Figure 1.1: Periodic replica of F(t)
and
(4)
Now write , producing
(5)
where the function is defined for any real
by
(6)
As L goes to infinity, evolves rather naturally into a function
which is known as the Fourier transform of F:
(7)
Moreover, since goes to zero as
and since
, ranges from
, Eq. (5) begins to look very much like a Riemann sum for the integral
Thus we are led to propose the equality
(8)
for nonperiodic F, when G is defined by Eq. (7). Equation (8) is called the Fourier
inversion formula.
Equations (7) and (8) are the essence of Fourier transform theory. As is suggested by this discussion, it is often profitable to indulge one’s whimsy and think of the integral in Eq. (8) as a generalized “sum” of sinusoids, summed over a continuum of frequencies . Equation (7) then dictates the “coefficients,”
, in the sum,
Example 1
Find the Fourier transform and verify the inversion formula for the function
Solution.
Observe that
is analytic except for simple poles at t= ±2. We shall use residue theory to evaluate the Fourier transform, interpreting the integral as a principal value:
If , we close the contour with expanding semicircles in the lower half-plane; we find
Similarly, for we close in the upper half-plane and find
In short
.
To verify the Fourier inversion formula we compute
By symmetry, the imaginary part vanishes, and this integral equals
Hence
As is the case of Fourier series, a wealth of theorems has been discovered stating conditions under which the Fourier integral representations (7) and (8) are valid. A useful one for applications deals with piecewise smooth functions F(t) ; that is, on every bounded interval F(t) is continuously differentiable for all but the finite number of values and at each
the “one-sided limits” of F(t) and F'(t) exist. Note the principal value interpretation of the integral is called for in the theorem; this ensures that the inverse transform converges at the points of discontinuity.
Theorem 4.
Suppose that F(t) is piecewise smooth on every bounded interval and that exists. Then the Fourier transform,
, of F exists and
Example 2
Find the Fourier transform of the function
and confirm the inversion formula
Figure:8.5 ‘Boxear’ function
Solution
we have
.
Hence theorem 4 tells us that
(10)
To confirm this, rewrite the left-hand side of (10) as
(11)
Now recall from Example 1, that
which, with the changes of variables,
generalizes to
Of course,
Therefore we derive
if then (11) becomes
if then (11) becomes
if then (11) becomes
if then (11) becomes
if then (11) becomes
.
Example 3
Find the Fourier transform of the function
(Fig. 8.6), and confirm the inversion formula. (Physicists call this function a finite
wave train.)
Figure 8.6: Finite wave train
Solution
We have
Since F(t) is continuous everywhere, the inversion formula implies
To confirm this rewrite the left-hand side as
(because of the removable singularities at = ±1).
Now the integral
can be evaluated using the indented-contour techniques. For wе employ the contour shown in Fig. 8.7(a) and invoke Lemmas 3 and 4 to obtain
=
=
=
Similarly, for we use the contour of Fig. 8.7(b) and find
[latex]\frac{-\sin t}{2}[/latex]
Figure 8.7: Contours for Example 3.
By the reasoning we obtains
Piecing this together we validate (12)
The Fourier transform equations are used just like Fourier series in solving linear systems.