Frobenius Method, we consider the general second order linear differential equation,
(9.1)
and attempt to solve it about a regular singular point . For that, we employ the Frobenius method as illustrated in the following theorem. It was discovered by the German mathematician George Frobenius (1848-1917) whose main research was in group theory and analysis. He worked in Berlin and Zurich and published his method for the series solution of linear ordinary differential equations in 1873.
Frobenius Theorem
If is a regular singular point of the differential equation , then there exists at least one series solution of this equation, of the form,
(9.2)
where the number ‘r‘ is a constant that is to be determined. This series converges on some interval , where R is the radius of convergence of the series.
Although, in general, we consider as a regular singular point, however, for convenience and simplify we assume
. If
, the equation can be transformed into one by letting
, say, so that origin is the regular singular point. Thus Eqn.(9.1) can be written as,
(9.3)
Accordingly, we seek a series solution of this equation of the form,
(9.4)
Differentiating it we obtain,
and
As the functions P(x) and Q(x) are assumed to be analytic at the origin, they can be expanded as Maclaurin series,
,
and
Substituting the values of y, y’ y”, P(x) and Q(x) in Eqn.(9.3) we obtain,
or,
(9.5)
For this equation to be satisfied identically the coefficient of cach power of x must be
zero. Since in this first term, we must have,
(9.6)
This equation is called indicial equation of the differential equation (9.1).
The indicial equation (9.6) of a second order linear differential equation of the form (9.3) can also be found directly without substituting (9.4) into it and carrying out simplification as given above. We can write (9.3) in the standard form,
and then evaluate and
as,
On substituting these values into Eqn.(9.6) we can obtain the requisite indicial equation.
The types of the roots , and
, say, of the indicial equation help us in finding the second linearly independent solution of a differential equation, one being given by Eqn.(9.5). Four different cases may arise as given below,
a. The roots and
may be real and distinct which do not differ by an integer.
b. The roots , and
may be real which differ by an integer.
c. The roots and
may be real and equal.
d. The roots and
may be complex conjugates.
Accordingly various forms of Frobenius solutions are discussed as under:
Forms of Frobenius Solutions Depending on the Nature of the Roots , and
of the Indicial Equation
The forms of solution of a differential equation depend on the roots and
, say, of its indicial equation. These solutions are discussed as under:
Case-I Roots
and
are Real and Distanct and 
In this case we obtain two linearly independent solution of the given differential equations as,
Case-II Roots
and
are Real and Distanct and 
The two linearly independent solutions in this case are,
where A is a constant , which may be equal to zero. Accordingly may or may not contain logarithm term.
Case-III Roots
and
are Real and Distanct and 
The two linearly independent solutions in this case are,
or,
(Assuming A=1 for simplicity)
Here always has a logarithm term.
Case-IV Roots
and
are Complex Conjugates say, 
If the indicial equation has the roots , say, with
then two linearly independent solutions of the given differential equation are the real and imaginary parts of,
where the coefficients are found as in Case-I.
First Method to Find the Second Linearly Independent Solution
The second solution can be found by the method of Reduction of Order. It asserts that if is a solution of the differential equation,
, then the second linearly independent solution is given by the formula,
The given equation can be written as,
Where and
. Thus ,
. So,
Therefore, the above formula for gives,
. (9.7)
Thus, Eqns. (9.7) give the general series-type solution of the given differential equation as,, i.e.,
where the series inside the brackets is convergent.
Second Method to Find the Second Linearly Independent Solution
The second linearly independent solution can also be found by the formula;
In the present case we have . Thus the above formula gives,
(9.8)
where . We find
and
and then substitute these values in the given differential equation,
to get,
We simplify the following equation as follows:
a. Since as a solution of the given differential equation, so,
b. We write ,
c. We separate the terms corresponding to n=0 in the remaining terms with summation sign to get,
Accordingly the above equation can be written as,
or,
(9.9)
Now,
so,
Substituting the values of and
in the above equation (9.9), the first term inside the square brackets becomes,
.
On collecting the terms with the same power of x it becomes
.
Therefore, Equation (9.9) becomes,
.
or,
Thus, equating the coefficients of various powers x to zero (since, RHS=0), we obtain,
coefficients of equated to zero gives:
it gives
,
coefficients of equated to zero gives:
it gives
,
coefficients of equated to zero gives:
it gives
,
coefficients of equated to zero gives:
it gives
,
and so on. Thus substituting the values of these coefficients in Equation (9.8) we obtain the second linearly independent solution of the given differential equation as,
(9.10)
which is same as obtained in first method.